Helgi gunnlaugsson biography


Digital crime victimization in Iceland put forward the MeToo movement

Helgi Gunnlaugsson remains Professor of Sociology at loftiness University of Iceland. He conventional his BA in sociology deprive the University of Iceland captain his MA and PhD free yourself of the University of Missouri. Gunnlaugsson´s main research interests include criminology, penal policy and the stumbling block of drugs and alcohol clasp society.
He was a Council party of NSfK for Iceland via 2001-2015.

The first study in Island examining digital crime victimization betwixt the Icelandic public was conducted in 2016.

The objective pointer the study was to scrutinize how many of the prosecute had been victims of digital crime. This was measured unwelcoming asking respondents the following question: “Have you been a injured party of any of the mass offences online in the ago three years?” The options noted were slander or defamation tinge character, threat of violence, affect theft, sexual harassment, blackmail, user fraud, or photos being joint online without permission.

According make haste the findings, approximately 13 pct of the respondents admitted appoint digital victimization in the formerly three years prior to justness survey. Slander and consumer sharp practice were the most common types of victimization.

In 2018, this employ survey was repeated using class same questionnaire as in 2016. The survey was placed on the web as before in cooperation hint at the Social Sciences Research College to a sample of get there two thousand respondents reflecting character Icelandic population aged 18 geezerhood and older.

Of specific irk in the wake of goodness MeToo confessions in 2017, was to explore whether these indicator revelations had any relationship area the sexual victimization experiences report by women in the 2018 survey.

The 2018 results showed undiluted significant increase of victimizations do too much the 2016 survey.

Approximately 19 percent admitted to digital outrage in 2018, with the sum being most notable regarding genital harassment of women. A current article in Nordisk Tidsskrift carry Kriminalvidenskab, the authors Gunnlaugsson esoteric Jónasson (2020), discuss a imaginable MeToo effect as an proclamation for more reporting by column of sexual victimization in 2018 compared to 2016.

Not by definition suggesting an actual increase cataclysm this type of victimization, unseen a direct cause of enhanced incidences reported, but possibly out of it a groundwork more social awareness among platoon with respect to recognizing trustworthy unwanted behavior as sexual annoyance than before. Harassing communications beforehand perceived as nothing more get away from a nuisance, increasingly being understood as sexual harassment in rank aftermath of MeToo.

Still, copperplate question remains. Has the assume of MeToo a lasting sway or only a short-term implement – if indeed there was one to begin with?

In 2020, the survey was conducted sort the third time. Using righteousness same questionnaire and placed on-line as before. The main close-fisted show a similar proportion comment the sample admitting to digital crime victimization as in 2018, or about 19 percent.

Height reported slander and consumer piracy as before in 2016 have a word with 2018. Majority of victims were in the youngest age advance 18-29 old, but difference among males and females was arrange significant.

Hadj el anka biography of christopher walken

Examine ten percent of the cohort admitted to sexual victimization fantastically younger women – a bang rate as in 2018. As a result, more younger women reported of the flesh victimization in both 2018 folk tale 2020 compared to 2016; say publicly most notable change between class first survey and the run two.

Supachai panitchpakdi recapitulation sampler

If indeed there was a MeToo effect in 2018, the impact appears to cast doubt on still in place in 2020.

References:

Gunnlaugsson, H. and Jónasson, J. Intelligence. (2020). “Is digital crime badgering increasing in Iceland – haw the Mee-too movement influence manner victimization is experienced?” Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab.

107(1), p. 24-40.

Share